Subject	They use an EPROM not EEPROM (n/m)
Posted by	Fast300 on May 30, 2008 at 3:47 AM
	This message has been viewed 67 times.
In Reply To	Yup, but doesn't the JWT EEPROM delete the AIV's anyways? (n/m) posted by MixManMash on May 29, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Message
Follow Ups	JWT ECU question. - MixManMash 10:10:01 05/28/08 Make sure the transmission types match (n/m) - Bernie (NoVA) 11:12:38 05/28/08 Ditto...unless it is an auto ECU then it works both ways. (n/m) - rojoloco (San Diego) 11:16:29 05/28/08 It does. Thanks Bernie! (n/m) - MixManMash 11:51:37 05/28/08 If it is 90-92 it will not be correct for a 93 unless - Fast300 21:00:33 05/28/08 What does it do differently at idle? (n/m) - MixManMash 09:50:22 05/29/08 93 deleted the AIV's (n/m) - Guapo 09:51:36 05/29/08 Yup, but doesn't the JWT EEPROM delete the AIV's anyways? (n/m) - MixManMash 10:53:26 05/29/08 I don't believe the older 90-92 programs do. I'm - Guapo 10:54:25 05/29/08 They do not, they had nothing to go by if programed - Fast300 03:47:18 05/30/08 They use an EPROM not EEPROM (n/m) - Fast300 03:47:55 05/30/08
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.